content creation – Agile Writing

Gen Zers Are Making Thousands of Dollars a Month Running Snail-Mail Subscription Clubs: I Don’t Think About Expenses ‘Paycheck to Paycheck Anymore’

content creation, monetization, social media

May 2 2026

Gen Z entrepreneurs are launching successful snail-mail subscription clubs, sending personalized letters, artwork, and other creative content to thousands of subscribers monthly, earning thousands of dollars in profit. These analog businesses, often promoted via social media, provide financial stability and career confidence for founders like Kiki Klassen and Trinity Shiroma, reflecting a trend towards tactile, offline experiences despite growing digital engagement.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/30/gen-z-snail-mail-subscription-clubs-making-thousands-per-month.html

Staff Journalists Sacked and Misleadingly Replaced With AI Writers

AI, content creation, critique, workforce, writing

Mar 4 2026

UK gaming sites replaced human writers with AI, creating fake authors and content. Clickout Media acquired The Escapist, Videogamer, and Esports Insider, leading to staff layoffs and AI-generated articles. Discontent among remaining staff is high regarding AI's implications for journalism, highlighted by a controversial AI review on Metacritic, which was removed due to authenticity concerns.

https://pressgazette.co.uk/news/staff-journalists-sacked-and-misleadingly-replaced-with-ai-writers/

AI Slop

AI, content creation, critique, writing

Mar 2 2026

AI-generated content isn't the problem; poor quality is. A sci-fi book praised for no AI involvement is still poorly written. Focus should be on quality, not quantity, as slop results from prioritizing volume over impact. The key question is “Who approved this?” rather than “Who created this?”

https://seths.blog/2026/03/ai-slop/

Are AI-generated Summaries Suitable for Studying and Research?

AI, content creation, critique, internet, summary

Feb 27 2026

AI-generated summaries lack academic reliability, often leading to misinformation and overgeneralization, harming learning and research. Human summarization involves critical cognitive skills necessary for retention and understanding, which AI cannot replicate. Ultimately, generating summaries with AI erodes these essential skills and may propagate inaccuracies in academic work. It's advised to rely on human-crafted abstracts or reviews instead.

https://www.tue.nl/en/our-university/library/library-news/24-02-2026-are-ai-generated-summaries-suitable-for-studying-and-research

The Suck Is Why We’re Here

AI, blogging, content creation, writing

Jan 5 2026

AI can mimic writing styles but lacks genuine thought and creativity, making it less useful for real writers who value the process. Relying on AI to generate content removes the important struggle that contributes to unique writing. The “suck” of writing is essential for growth, and embracing it ultimately leads to better work.

https://nik.art/the-suck-is-why-were-here/